|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 78-84
Macroglossia in neurosurgery
Melissa Brockerville, Lakshmikumar Venkatraghavan, Pirjo Manninen
Department of Anaesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|Date of Web Publication||4-May-2017|
Department of Anaesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Macroglossia, an abnormal swelling of the tongue, is a rare post-operative complication often associated with serious airway obstruction and prolonged intubations. Currently, there is a paucity of information on the true incidence, aetiology, and complications associated with macroglossia. A thorough review of the literature was carried out so as to summarise the characteristics of reported cases of macroglossia and to present potential treatments and preventive strategies. A literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify human case reports of macroglossia after neurosurgical procedures including spine, published in English from 1974 to December 2015. A total of 26 reports with 36 cases of macroglossia were identified. Macroglossia was most commonly reported after sub-occipital and/or posterior fossa craniotomies and spine surgeries in prone or park-bench positions. It is more common after procedures lasting >8 h. The aetiology of macroglossia is multi-factorial and possible mechanisms included local mechanical tongue compression interfering with venous and/or lymphatic drainage, regional venous thrombosis and/or local trauma. Complications included airway obstruction, re-intubation, difficult re-intubation, prolonged intubation and Intensive Care Unit stay and tongue necrosis. Prevention, awareness of the possibility, and early recognition are the best forms of treatment.
Keywords: Macroglossia, neurosurgery, spinal surgery
|How to cite this article:|
Brockerville M, Venkatraghavan L, Manninen P. Macroglossia in neurosurgery. J Neuroanaesthesiol Crit Care 2017;4:78-84
| Introduction|| |
Macroglossia, an abnormal swelling of the tongue that may occur in the post-operative period, has been associated with many serious consequences such as acute airway obstruction and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) admissions [Figure 1]. The incidence of macroglossia following neurosurgical procedures is not known. Moore et al. reviewed all posterior fossa craniotomies performed at their institution over 6 years and reported an incidence of 1%. However, this potentially serious complication is likely to be more common.
|Figure 1: Macroglossia in a neurosurgical patient after spine surgery in prone position (permission obtained from the patient)|
Click here to view
A review of the literature revealed that there were many case reports of macroglossia following neurosurgery and spine surgery; however, there were no recent complete reviews. Aim of this manuscript was to present a thorough review of the literature to highlight the characteristics of reported cases of macroglossia and to discuss the possible aetiology, potential treatments and preventive strategies as suggested in the available literature.
| Literature Search|| |
A literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify human case reports of macroglossia after neurosurgical procedures including spine, published in English from 1974 to December 2015. The keywords used for this search included 'macroglossia', 'angioedema', 'hemimacroglossia', 'oropharyngeal swelling', 'tongue', 'swelling', 'swollen', 'enlargement', 'lingual oedema', 'lingual swelling', 'neurosurgery', 'spine', 'spinal' 'cervical', 'thoracic', 'lumbar', 'prone', 'park-bench', 'supine', and 'sitting'. Additional articles were identified from the references of the selected literature.
Articles were included if they were case reports that involved macroglossia after neurosurgical procedures in paediatric and adult patients.
Cases were excluded if the surgery was not completed, if swelling also occurred in areas below the neck, if there was a pre-existing congenital macroglossia or if there were multiple surgeries and it was unclear after which surgery the patient developed macroglossia [Table 1] for the list of case reports included in this review.,,
Case reports of macroglossia were reviewed for specific surgical and patient characteristics including: Surgical position, surgical procedure, duration of surgery, timing of the development of macroglossia, location and duration of swelling, any required airway interventions (intubation, tracheostomy, cricothyroidotomy) and the intraoperative use of a bite block, oropharyngeal airway or throat pack. The case reports were also reviewed for patient complications, possible aetiologies, treatments, and recommendations for prevention of macroglossia.
| Case Reports|| |
A total of 26 reports with 36 cases of macroglossia (29 following neurosurgery and 7 following spinal surgery) met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Eight patients were < age 18. Characteristics of the procedures are shown in [Figure 2]a,[Figure 2]b,[Figure 2]c. Fifty per cent of macroglossia cases occurred in procedures lasting longer than 8 h. The most common surgical positions associated with macroglossia were prone (30.6%), park-bench (25.0%) and sitting (19.4%). The most common procedures associated with macroglossia were sub-occiptal and/or posterior fossa craniotomies (38.9%) and spinal surgery (19.4%). Information about the specific surgical procedure was not available for 13 (36.1%) cases. Duration of macroglossia varied, lasting from 24 h to 12 weeks: <7 days in 6 cases (16.7%), ≥7 days in 18 cases (50.0%), and unknown in 12 cases (33.3%).
|Figure 2: Characteristics of surgical procedures where macroglossia occurred. a) Duration of procedure; (b) position during surgery; (c) type of surgery|
Click here to view
The timing to the onset of macroglossia after surgery and required airway interventions for acute airway obstruction (intubation and/or surgical airway) is shown in [Table 2]. The timing of the onset of macroglossia varied from being present before extubation to >24 h after extubation. Information about timing of macroglossia and required airway interventions was not available for 27.8% of patients. Of the 14 cases of macroglossia present at the end of the surgery before extubation, 8 of these patients were not extubated. There was one additional patient who was not extubated after the surgical procedure for planned mechanical ventilation but later developed macroglossia ≥24 h post-operatively and was subsequently not extubated until post-operative day 12. All other patients included in this review were extubated immediately after surgery. In many patients, re-intubation was reported to be difficult after the development of macroglossia and emergency tracheostomies or cricothyroidotomies were required in some patients.,,,,,,
The location of the swelling was pre-dominantly isolated to the tongue in 58.3% (n = 21) of patients. The use of a bite block, oropharyngeal airway and throat pack was reported in 27.8% (n = 10), 5.6% (n = 2) and 16.7% (n = 6) of patients, respectively. One patient had a mouth pack and one patient had gauze packed around the endotracheal tube.
Ten patients required a late tracheostomy. In these patients, the tongue swelling failed to resolve and pressure from the endotracheal tube was thought to be a contributing factor.,,,,,,,,
In addition to airway obstruction, other complications reported included pain associated with the macroglossia,,, difficulty with speech and swallowing ,,, protrusion of the tongue leading to chronic drying and fissuring with superimposed infection, necrosis,,,,, ulceration ,,, and haematomas of the tongue. In one case, mechanical dental compression worsened the macroglossia and resulted in a laceration. Some patients needed surgery (lingual debridement,, or partial glossectomy ) as the tongue necrosis was severe. Long-term consequences such as cosmetic disfigurement of the tongue  and chronic dysarthria have also been reported. There were no reported cases of death directly attributable to post-operative macroglossia.
| Aetiology|| |
The exact aetiology of macroglossia was difficult to define and the reports listed many possible causes and contributing factors. These are listed in [Table 3]. However, there are also other considerations in the differential diagnosis of macroglossia. Angioedema may cause macroglossia; but depending on the aetiology, the skin and mucosa of the extremities, bowel, genitalia, face and throat may also be involved. Enlargement of the tongue could be related to infections which could occur acutely from bleeding or odontogenic infections spreading into the floor of the mouth. Excess fluid intake may also be a cofactor for macroglossia; however, the swelling was not be isolated to the tongue. Patients can have pre-existing or chronic macroglossia from conditions such as Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome, venous and/or lymphatic malformations, focal tumours, amyloidosis, mucopolysaccharidoses and chronic infection. The tongue can be relatively larg if the mandible or maxilla is small, or if there is muscular hypotonia.
Different patterns in the development of macroglossia, such as mild and severe, have also been described., The mild form is caused by local venous or lymphatic congestion secondary to local compression or venous obstruction. The onset of this macroglossia tends to be immediate. Obstruction of the airway is unlikely because the swelling will be recognised before extubation and the swelling tends to be isolated to the tongue. The severe form is secondary to a re-perfusion injury. The onset may be delayed and may be more dangerous because it can occur after the patient is extubated. In the severe form, areas other than the tongue may be involved.
| Treatment|| |
Various considerations for the treatments were reported in the literature; however, their effectiveness has not been evaluated. In general, patients were placed in the upright position , to improve venous drainage. The use of medications included oral steroids (dexamethasone,,,,,,,,, hydrocortisone,, methylprednisolone ,, and triamcinolone, unspecified ,,,), and topical and oral analgesics. However, steroid treatment was reported to be ineffective in some cases.,, Antibiotics and anti-fungal treatments were used when concomitant infection was suspected. Additional medications that were used included: sodium succinate, ranitidine, aerosols (ipratropium bromide, albuterol sulphate), tranexamic acid, promethazine, cetirizine, furosemide  and phenylephrine. Other treatment modalities included humidified oxygen , and wrapping the tongue in wet gauze to prevent desiccation., Some patients required neck exploration, debridement, and hemi-glossectomy. Glossal massage was reported to hasten the resolution of the lymphatic oedema and stimulate the patient to move their tongue, more which may have contributed, to the resolution of macroglossia. The insertion of single ,, or bilateral bite blocks  after the macroglossia has developed has been suggested to relieve pressure on the tongue.
Many patients required a tracheostomy later in their post-operative course ,,,,,,,, to reduce pressure on the tongue from the endotracheal tube. A nasal endotracheal tube may cause less compression on an already swollen tongue and maybe more comfortable for the patient  though this has not been shown to be the situation in all patients.,,
| Prevention|| |
Many recommendations on the prevention of macroglossia were reported. An oral airway (such as Guedel) should not be used because it may cause a tongue compression injury,,, especially as most of the pressure from the airway occurs posteriorly in the midline of the tongue and this has a greater effect on the arterial system [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b. The use of pharyngeal packs  and oral packing  should also be avoided unless required because the airway may be contaminated with blood and/or tissue during the surgery. The use of a soft bite block placed between the teeth has been recommended ,,,, as this keeps the mouth in a slightly open position and prevents protrusion of the tongue between the upper and lower teeth. This is important, especially in the lateral, prone, or sitting position, where the tongue may come to rest between the upper and lower teeth. The bite block can move during patient positioning and should be secured to prevent dislodgement and should again be periodically inspected during the case. Although bite blocks are used to prevent injury to the tongue and macroglossia, they can also cause trauma. The position of the bite block should be inspected to ensure that the tongue and the lips are clear of the teeth and not trapped by the bite block. 'Overcrowding' of the mouth leading to tongue compression can easily occur with the use of multiple objects in the mouth – (endotracheal tube, oral gastric tube, temperature probe, oesophageal stethoscope), especially in patients with small mouths or with large tongues. A nasal gastric tube, alternate site for temperature monitoring and precordial stethoscope could be used. A nasal endotracheal tube intraoperatively may decrease the risk of macroglossia and would be less likely to do further damage if swelling developed.
|Figure 3: The blood supply of tongue (a) and the effect of oral airway on the tongue vascular supply (b)|
Click here to view
If head fixation is with a head holder using a chin bar, the bar that supports the mandible should be checked to ensure that it does not cause soft tissue compression., Extreme flexion of the neck should be avoided , as this may prevent venous drainage and compress the airway, endotracheal tube and tracheal rings against the base of the tongue., There should be a distance of a least two finger breadths between the chin and the sternum to avoid this extreme flexion. After positioning, patients should be checked carefully for signs of obstruction (discoloration in the face, lips and tongue)., The hydration status of the patient should also be carefully monitored as hypervolemic states may produce more swelling.
| Discussion|| |
Macroglossia is an uncommon and rare, but potentially dangerous complication following neurosurgery and spinal surgery. In our review of the literature, we found 36 cases of macroglossia following neurosurgical and spine procedures. Macroglossia has been most commonly reported after subocciptal/posterior fossa craniotomies and spine surgeries and after surgeries in the prone, park-bench and sitting positions. Macroglossia most often occurred after procedures lasting >8 h. The aetiology of macroglossia is likely multi-factorial and varies from case to case. Potential aetiologies include local mechanical compression interfering with venous and/or lymphatic drainage and/or arterial inflow, regional venous and/or lymphatic obstruction, local or regional venous thrombosis, reperfusion injury, neurological origin or trauma associated. Complications included airway obstruction, re-intubation, difficult re-intubation, prolonged intubation and ICU stay and tongue necrosis.
In our review of the literature, there was no standardised approach for the treatment of the patient with acute macroglossia. There was no recommendation about how specifically the airway should be managed in a patient with macroglossia; however, airway management can be challenging and a surgical airway may be needed. Early recognition and more importantly prevention of macroglossia was suggested as the best way to avoid the potentially serious complications of macroglossia. The many different recommendations suggested are summarised in [Table 4].
| Conclusion|| |
Macroglossia following neurosurgical and spine procedures is not common but when it occurs it can be a devastating complication. All patients who are at risk for macroglossia should be carefully examined for any evidence at the end of the procedure. If a patient has any evidence of macroglossia, the safest approach is to leave the patient's trachea intubated until the swelling subsides. Prevention, awareness of the possibility and early recognition are the best forms of treatment.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Moore JK, Chaudhri S, Moore AP, Easton J. Macroglossia and posterior fossa disease. Anaesthesia 1988;43:382-5.
Sinha A, Agarwal A, Gaur A, Pandey CK. Oropharyngeal swelling and macroglossia after cervical spine surgery in the prone position. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2001;13:237-9.
Ellis SC, Bryan-Brown CW, Hyderally H. Massive swelling of the head and neck. Anesthesiology 1975;42:102-3.
Carie CM, White DR, Discolo CM. Postoperative massive tongue edema in craniosynostotic children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:1173-5.
Lam AM, Vavilala MS. Macroglossia: Compartment syndrome of the tongue? Anesthesiology 2000;92:1832-5.
Krnacik MJ, Heggeness MH. Severe angioedema causing airway obstruction after anterior cervical surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2188-90.
Miura Y, Mimatsu K, Iwata H. Massive tongue swelling as a complication after spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:339-41.
Chowdhury T, Gupta N, Rath GP. Macroglossia in a child undergoing posterior fossa surgery in sitting position. Saudi J Anaesth 2012;6:85-6. [Full text]
Mayhew JF, Miner M, Katz J. Macroglossia in a 16-month-old child after a craniotomy. Anesthesiology 1985;62:683-4.
Vermeersch G, Menovsky T, De Ridder D, De Bodt M, Saldien V, Van de Heyning P. Life-threatening macroglossia after posterior fossa surgery: A surgical positioning problem? B-ENT 2014;10:309-13.
El Hassani Y, Narata AP, Pereira VM, Schaller C. A reminder for a very rare entity: Massive tongue swelling after posterior fossa surgery. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2012;73:171-4.
Denneny JC 3rd
. Postoperative macroglossia causing airway obstruction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1985;9:189-94.
Iwuchukwu I, Ardelt A, Cueva W, Reshi R, Goldenberg F, Frank J. Macroglossia associated with brainstem injury. Neurocrit Care 2014;20:106-10.
Nimjee SM, Wright DR, Agrawal A, McDonagh DL, Husain AM, Britz GW. Tongue swelling and necrosis after brain tumor surgery. Asian J Neurosurg 2012;7:214-6.
] [Full text]
Teeple E, Maroon J, Rueger R. Hemimacroglossia and unilateral ischemic necrosis of the tongue in a long-duration neurosurgical procedure. Anesthesiology 1986;64:845-6.
Toyama S, Hoya K, Matsuoka K, Numai T, Shimoyama M. Massive macroglossia developing fast and immediately after endotracheal extubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:256-9.
Kawaguchi M, Sakamoto T, Ohnishi H, Karasawa J. Pharyngeal packs can cause massive swelling of the tongue after neurosurgical procedures. Anesthesiology 1995;83:434-5.
Kuhnert SM, Faust RJ, Berge KH, Piepgras DG. Postoperative macroglossia: Report of a case with rapid resolution after extubation of the trachea. Anesth Analg 1999;88:220-3.
Koizumi H, Utsuki S, Inukai M, Oka H, Osawa S, Fujii K. An operation in the park bench position complicated by massive tongue swelling. Case Rep Neurol Med 2012;2012:165860.
Ishiyama T, Murakami N, Takeda T, Yamamoto M. Macroglossia after neck clipping of a VA-PICA (vertebral artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery) aneurysm. Masui 1990;39:503-7.
Barbara DW, Ronan KP, Maddox DE, Warner MA. Perioperative angioedema: Background, diagnosis, and management. J Clin Anesth 2013;25:335-43.
Perkins JA. Overview of macroglossia and its treatment. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;17:460-5.
Tsung YC, Wu CT, Hsu CH, Yeh CC, Lin SL, Wong CS. Macroglossia after posterior fossa surgery in the prone position – A case report. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2006;44:43-6.
Pivalizza EG, Katz J, Singh S, Liu W, McGraw-Wall BL. Massive macroglossia after posterior fossa surgery in the prone position. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1998;10:34-6.
McAllister RG. Macroglossia – A positional complication. Anesthesiology 1974;40:199-200.
Tattersall MP. Massive swelling of the face and tongue. A complication of posterior cranial fossa surgery in the sitting position. Anaesthesia 1984;39:1015-7.
Drummond JC. Macroglossia, deja vu. Anesth Analg 1999;89:534-5.
Tamkus A, Rice K. The incidence of bite injuries associated with transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring. Anesth Analg 2012;115:663-7.
Deiner SG, Osborn IP. Prevention of airway injury during spine surgery: Rethinking bite blocks. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009;21:68-9.
Munshi CA, Dhamee MS, Gandhi SK. Postoperative unilateral facial oedema: A complication of acute flexion of the neck. Can Anaesth Soc J 1984;31:197-9.
Sokhal N, Chowdhury T, Goyal K. Postoperative lingual edema is not always a predictor of airway compromise. Saudi J Anaesth 2012;6:79-80. [Full text]
Jakobson DJ, Einav S, Krichevsky I, Sprung CL, Sela MS. Traumatic macroglossia: A life-threatening complication. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1643-5.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]